2026년 9월 10일 목요일

KARA SF(샌프란시스코 한인외식업협회) 노동법 세미나

 


[김해원의 식도락법(34)] “하루 10시간 만들어도 남는 게 없다”

 https://knewsla.com/column/20260815766755352219/

대형 ‘마켓 스시’ 업체들 노동법 소송...샌디에고 카운티, 에이스 스시·AFC·푸지산 등 5개 업체 제소

미국 내 마켓의 스시 섹션 (마켓 스시)에 스시를 제공하는 대형 프랜차이스 업계들이 샌디에고 카운티로부터 노동법 소송을 당했다.

샌디에고 카운티 노동청 (The Office of Labor Standards and Enforcement for San Diego County)은 지난 6월17일 캘리포니아 주민들을 대신해서 샌디에고 수피리어 법원에 5군데의 마켓 스시 (grocery store sushi) 회사들을 상대로 노동법 소송을 제기했다. 주로 중국계 회사인 피고들은 에이스 스시 프랜차이즈, 아시아나 매니지먼트 그룹, 어드밴스드 프레시 컨셉츠 프랜차 이스, 푸지산 프랜차이싱, 푸지 푸드 프러덕츠 등이다.

마켓 스시는 신선하게 포장된 롤, 초밥, 콤보 팩 등을 간편하게 구매할 수 있는 즉석 식품 (grab-and-go sushi) 코너로 대개 매장 내 상주하는 전문 조리사나 외주 업체를 통해 당일 생산·판매 방식으로 운영된다. 한인 마켓에도 대부분 있는 마켓 스시는 미국 내서 24억 달러 규모의 매출을 매년 기록하는 대형 업종이다.

그러나 이 스시를 직접 만드는 종업원들은 사실 그렇게 많이 돈을 벌지 못한다. 샌디에고 카운티의 소송은 이 스시 메이커들을 종업원이 아니라 독립계약자로 잘못 분류했다고 밝히고 있다.

그래서 이 스시 메이커들은 종업원으로써 받아야 하는 보호를 회사로 부터 못 받고, 스시 로봇이나 냉장고 전시, 도구, 마케팅 비용,프랜차이저 서비스 등의 비용을 위해 본인들이 비용을 부담해야 한다. 그리고 이들은 프랜차이즈 계약의 종결을 막기 위해 매달 최소한의 음식 과 포장을 구입해야 하고 주 7일, 일주일에 50-70시간이라는 긴 시간을 스시 쉐프들이 일을 해야 한다.

직원들에게 페이가 매우 낮고 장비 렌탈, 음식 재료, 파이넌싱 페이, 프랜차이즈 비용, 보험, 유니폼 비용 등을 공제하 면 대부분의 프랜차이즈 가맹업주들은 긴 근무 시간에도 불구하고 남는 이익이 거의 없다. 수익은 일단 수퍼마켓과 위에 거론한 스시 회사 사이에 분배되고 프랜차이즈 가맹업주들은 남은 수익에서 세금, 인건비, 보험 등을 공제한 순수익을 가져간다.

샌디에고 카운티의 소송은 체불임금과 변호사비를 요구하고 있다. 프랜차이즈 가맹업주 (franchisee)들을 독립계약자로 분류하는 이유는 이들을 종업원으로 분류할 경우 상해 보험을 들어줘야 하고 오버타임, 식사시간 휴식시간, 최저임금 등을 제공해야 하기 때문 이다. 마켓 스시 업체들이 프랜차이즈 가맹업주/스시 쉐프들의 업무, 비즈니스, 재정적 면을 통제 하기 때문에 이들을 독립계약자로 분류할 수 없다는 것이 노동법과 세법이다.

특히 레시피, 스시 퀄리티, 스퀘줄, 스시 제작 조건들 같이 대부분의 중요한 결정이 마켓 스시 회사들에 의해 정해지기 때문에 종업원으로 구분되어야 한다.

이런 잘못된 직원 분류는 한인 마켓에서도 가능한 현상이라고 볼 수 있기 때문에 한인 업체도 이런 노동법 소송의 가능성이 있다고 본다.

<김해원 발행인>

2026년 9월 9일 수요일

김해원 변호사, 18일 노동법 세미나

 http://www.koreatimes.com/article/20260902/1628201


김해원 변호사, 18일 노동법 세미나

 댓글 2026-09-03 (목) 12:00:00 조환동 기자
건전한 댓글 문화 운영 원칙

댓글 안에 당신의 성

[김해원 칼럼 (124)] 식당 매매 과정에서 발생하는 노동법 이슈들

 https://knewsla.com/column/20260907180180/




(3) 노동법 준수: 많은 경우 셀러 고용주가 오래전부터 가게를 운영해 왔기 때문에 캘리 포니아주 노동법을 안 지키고 종업원들을 채용했을 가능성이 높다. 그런데 새로운 고용 주가 가게를 인수해서 노동법을 지켜서 운영하려고 할 경우 이전 주인 밑에서 근무했던 종업원들이 이를 불편해 할 가능성이 높다. 예를 들어 셀러 고용주 밑에서는 타임카드도 제대로 작성하지 않고 출퇴근 시간도 지키지 않았고 식사시간, 휴식시간 노티스나 중재계약서 같은 아무런 서류에 사인도 하지 않았을 가능성이 높기 때문이다. 그러나 바이어 고용주는 이런 모든 노동법 조항들을 준수하려고 시도하면 종업원들은 갑자기 변한 고용 환경에 대해 불만을 표할 수 있다. 그래도 노동법 준수로 인해 생기는 이익이 훨씬 크기 때문에 고용주는 노동법을 지켜야지 자신과 가게를 보호할 수 있다.

(4) 노동법 소송 중 업소 인수: 많은 경우 노동법 민사소송이 걸려있는 가게는 바이어가 인수할 수 없다. 그렇기 때문에 바이어는 부동산 에이전트에게 셀러 가게가 혹시 소송이 걸려 있는 지 여부를 확인해야 한다. 그러나 상해보험 클레임이나 노동청 케이스가 진행 중인 식당은 바이어가 인수하는데 아무런 문제가 없다.

(5) POS 시스템: 요즘은 많은 식당들이 POS (Point of Sales) 시스템들을 많이 사용한다. 문제는 많은 식당 오너들이 POS 시스템에 있는 자료들을 따로 하드웨어나 클라우드에 저장하거나 프린트 해놓지 않는다는 점이다. 이전 오너가 가지고 있던 POS 시스템을 더이상 사용하 지 않을 경우 POS 회사는 따로 이 정보를 저장하지 않는 경우를 많이 봤다. 즉, 셀러가 고용하고 있던 종업원들의 근무기록이 가게를 팔면 그냥 없어진다. 이럴 경우 셀러가 노동법 소송을 당하면 이를 방어할 가장 중요한 근무기록이 없다는 약점이 노출 된다. 그렇기 때문에 셀러는 가게를 팔기 전에 POS에 저장되어 있는 기록 들을 따로 저장해야 한다.


2026년 9월 8일 화요일

Council backs L.A. fast-food worker scheduling protections as businesses complain of tight margins

 https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-09-08/la-council-backs-fast-food-worker-scheduling-protections-over-industry-objections

Council backs L.A. fast-food worker scheduling protections as businesses complain of tight margins

  • Click here to listen to this article

See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. Set us as preferred 

The Los Angeles City Council on Tuesday approved scheduling protections and in-person labor rights training for fast-food workers, despite business owners’ objections that the new rules would burden local franchisees who already operate on thin profit margins.

Existing city law, known as the Fair Work Week ordinance, requires certain retail businesses to give workers their schedule at least two weeks in advance. Businesses also must provide workers at least 10 hours’ rest between shifts, or provide extra pay for that work.

The council’s vote Tuesday, which directs the city attorney to draft language extending such protections to workers in the fast-food industry, was approved 10 to 2, with Councilmembers John Lee and Traci Park opposed.

Labor groups sponsoring the new protections — Starbucks Workers United and the California Fast Food Workers Union, which is affiliated with Service Employees International Union — have contended that the fast-food workforce faces unstable schedules that make it difficult for workers, many of them women and immigrants, to plan their finances, child care, medical appointments and other obligations.

In their vote, City Council members also ordered a report with a framework on how to implement a mandatory six-hour paid training to educate workers on minimum wage laws and other labor protections.

“We can pass strong labor laws, but if the workers don’t know what those laws mean, then we’re not really doing our job as a city,” Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martínez, who first proposed the ordinance, said after the vote.

City Council members considered including a virtual option for the paid training, but ultimately decided workers should have at least their initial training in person to effectively communicate their rights.

“Workers need to be able to ask questions, share their experiences and practice how to respond to situations like wage theft, health and safety violations, harassment and retaliation,” Victor Tobar, communications director for Worker Empowerment Community Network–Los Angeles, said during Tuesday’s public comment period.

Trust is key for immigrant workers to allow them to feel comfortable asking for help, he added.

Blanca Romero, a McDonald’s worker in Los Angeles for nine years, said during public comment that the Fair Work Week ordinance would help longtime employees like herself who often have their hours cut, even as the business hires additional people.

The law requires that an employer offer work to qualified current employees before hiring a new employee or using a contractor.

“We deserve respect,” she said.

Some local business owners urged the council to reject the ordinance, saying the resulting added costs would be onerous and unnecessary.

Juancarlos Chacon, who owns several Jersey Mike’s Subs stores in the L.A. area and in Las Vegas, said 2023 state legislation that increased the minimum wage for fast-food workers has already stretched his businesses, forcing him to cut hours and eliminate positions.

“This ordinance adds more weight onto businesses that are already struggling to survive,” Chacon said.

Chacon said that his businesses, which employ more than 200 people, already educate workers on their rights in new team member orientations, and that information on labor laws is clearly displayed on posters inside the stores.

Jason Hendifar of Waldorf Restaurant Group said only half of his 10 restaurants in Los Angeles are profitable. The others either break even or are in the red.

“California is already the hardest state to operate a small business in,” he said. “We do not need more regulation and more costs.”

Waldorf Restaurant Group operates franchise locations of Burger King and El Pollo Loco, according to public records.


ADVERTISEMENT

Council backs L.A. fast-food worker scheduling protections as businesses complain of tight margins

A worker delivers a meal to a customer at a Carl's Jr.
A worker delivers a meal to a customer in the drive-through at a Carl’s Jr. in North Hollywood on April 21.
(Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times)
  • Click here to listen to this article

See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. Set us as preferred 

The Los Angeles City Council on Tuesday approved scheduling protections and in-person labor rights training for fast-food workers, despite business owners’ objections that the new rules would burden local franchisees who already operate on thin profit margins.

Existing city law, known as the Fair Work Week ordinance, requires certain retail businesses to give workers their schedule at least two weeks in advance. Businesses also must provide workers at least 10 hours’ rest between shifts, or provide extra pay for that work.

The council’s vote Tuesday, which directs the city attorney to draft language extending such protections to workers in the fast-food industry, was approved 10 to 2, with Councilmembers John Lee and Traci Park opposed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Labor groups sponsoring the new protections — Starbucks Workers United and the California Fast Food Workers Union, which is affiliated with Service Employees International Union — have contended that the fast-food workforce faces unstable schedules that make it difficult for workers, many of them women and immigrants, to plan their finances, child care, medical appointments and other obligations.

In their vote, City Council members also ordered a report with a framework on how to implement a mandatory six-hour paid training to educate workers on minimum wage laws and other labor protections.

“We can pass strong labor laws, but if the workers don’t know what those laws mean, then we’re not really doing our job as a city,” Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martínez, who first proposed the ordinance, said after the vote.

ADVERTISEMENT

City Council members considered including a virtual option for the paid training, but ultimately decided workers should have at least their initial training in person to effectively communicate their rights.

“Workers need to be able to ask questions, share their experiences and practice how to respond to situations like wage theft, health and safety violations, harassment and retaliation,” Victor Tobar, communications director for Worker Empowerment Community Network–Los Angeles, said during Tuesday’s public comment period.

Trust is key for immigrant workers to allow them to feel comfortable asking for help, he added.

Blanca Romero, a McDonald’s worker in Los Angeles for nine years, said during public comment that the Fair Work Week ordinance would help longtime employees like herself who often have their hours cut, even as the business hires additional people.

The law requires that an employer offer work to qualified current employees before hiring a new employee or using a contractor.

“We deserve respect,” she said.

Some local business owners urged the council to reject the ordinance, saying the resulting added costs would be onerous and unnecessary.

Juancarlos Chacon, who owns several Jersey Mike’s Subs stores in the L.A. area and in Las Vegas, said 2023 state legislation that increased the minimum wage for fast-food workers has already stretched his businesses, forcing him to cut hours and eliminate positions.

“This ordinance adds more weight onto businesses that are already struggling to survive,” Chacon said.

Chacon said that his businesses, which employ more than 200 people, already educate workers on their rights in new team member orientations, and that information on labor laws is clearly displayed on posters inside the stores.

Jason Hendifar of Waldorf Restaurant Group said only half of his 10 restaurants in Los Angeles are profitable. The others either break even or are in the red.

“California is already the hardest state to operate a small business in,” he said. “We do not need more regulation and more costs.”

Waldorf Restaurant Group operates franchise locations of Burger King and El Pollo Loco, according to public records.

In a letter to the council ahead of Tuesday’s meeting, the California Restaurant Assn. contended that the ordinance will hinder an industry that has long served as a successful pathway to business ownership for minority entrepreneurs.

The business group also took issue with third parties administering worker training, saying that labor groups could use them to prime the workforce for union campaigns.

As part of its vote, the council also approved an amendment introduced by Councilmember Adrin Nazarian recommending the city attorney assess potential legal liabilities for mandating in-person training requirements.

City officials are seeking to implement the law for businesses operating more than one franchise location starting next April. Employers that operate only one location will have until October 2027 to comply, according to an amendment approved by the council.