2024년 7월 26일 금요일

우버 운전자, 직원 아닌 독립계약자’ 주대법원 최종판결 … 노조 큰 타격

 https://www.knewsla.com/top2/20240725669667/

우버 운전자, 직원 아닌 독립계약자’ 주대법원 최종판결 … 노조 큰 타격

우버와 리프트 등 앱기반 차량공유서비스 테크 업체들 큰 승리

Photo by Thought Catalog on Unsplash

우버가 4년간의 법정 싸움 끝에 긱 노동자는 직원이 아닌 ‘독립계약자’는 대법원 최종 판결을 받아냈다.

25일 캘리포니아 주대법원은 우버와 리프트와 같은 앱 기반의 차량 호출 및 배달 서비스 업체에서 일하는 ‘긱 노동자’는 직원이 아닌 ‘독립계약자’라고 최종 판결했다.

이날 주 대법원의 만장일치 판결과 우버와 리프트 등은 큰 승리를 안게 됐다. 또 이날 판결로 앱 기반 서비스 노동자의 지위를 둘러싸고 지난 4년간 벌어진 노동조합과 업체들간의 법적 공방도 종식되었다.

이번 판결은 우버 및 리프트와 같은 업체의 운전자는 ‘독립 계약자’ 신분으로 봐야 하며 때문에 초과 근무 수당, 유급 병가 및 실업 보험과 같은 혜택을 받을 자격이 없다고 최종 결론을 내렸으며 이는 지난 2020년 통과된 발의안의 합법성을 인정한 것이다.

그러나 우버 등 운전자의 노동자 신분을 주장해온 노조측은 지난 2020년 통과된 발의안이  주의회의 권한을 제한한 것으로 불법성이 내포됐다고 주장해왔다.

지난 2021년 하급 법원 판결에서는 이 조치가 불법이라고 밝혔지만, 항소 법원은 지난해 그 결정을 뒤집었고, 주대법원이 이를 최종 승인한 것이다.

우버측은 “운전기사나 택배기사가 일주일에 몇 시간 이상을 벌기로 선택하든, 원하는 시간과 방식으로 일할 수 있는 자유는 이제 캘리포니아 주법에 확고하게 각인된 셈”이라며 “그들을 고용된 직원신분으로 강요하려는 그간의 잘못된 시도가 종식됐다”는 환영 성명을 발표했다.

이번 판결은 우버와 리프트사 등에게는 승리를 안겨줬지만 운전자의 더 많은 권리를 확보하기 위해 투쟁한 노동조합과 의회 내 동맹세력애게는 큰 패배가 됐다.

지난 2019년 주의회는 우버와 리프트 운전자에게 최저 임금, 초과 근무 수당, 건강 보험, 비용 상환과 같은 보호조치 제공을 의무화는 법안을 통과시켰으며, 독립계약자와 직원에 대한 새로운 규칙을 제정한 바 있다.

그러나 우버와 리프트 등 앱 기반 차량 공유 및 배달 회사들은 운전자들은 직원이 아닌 독립계약자라고 강력히 주장하며 이 주법을 무효화하기 위한 발의안 캠페인을 펼쳐 2020년 11월 선거에서 운전자들이 직원이 아닌 ‘독립계약자’신분임을 규정하는 발의안 22를 통과시키는데 성공했다.

법안 22는 지난 2020년 11월 캘리포니아 유권자의 약 60%가 찬성해 통과됐다.

이후 노조측은 이 발의안 22를 다시 전복하기 위한 법률 투쟁을 벌여왔으나 이날 대법원 판결로 긱 노동자를 ‘직원 신분’으로 전환하는데 성공하지 못했다.

<김상목 기자>

"실내작업장 82도 이하로"

https://www.koreatowndaily.com/articles/20240726171915


"실내작업장 82도 이하로"

가주 '온열질환 방지법' 시행

요식· 봉제·물류업 등 
한인 업주들 주의해야

남가주 일원에 폭염이 지속되고 있는 가운데 실내에서 일하는 근로자를 위해 실내 온도를 일정하게 유지해야 하는 법이 캘리포니아에서 본격 시행에 들어갔다. 식당 주방이나 창고, 봉제공장, 빨래방 등 실내 온도가 크게 오를 수 있는 모든 실내 작업장이 적용 대상이어서 관련된 한인 업주들의 각별한 주의가 요망되고 있다.
24일 LA타임스(LAT)는 가주 직업안전보건위원회(OSHSB)가 지난달 20일 만장일치로 승인한 실내 작업장 온도를 화씨 82도를 초과하지 않도록 규정하는 '실내 온열질환 방지법'이 지난 23일부터 시행에 들어가 관련 업주들의 경각심이 요구된다고 전했다.
실내 작업장을 운영하고 있는 업주는 실내 온도를 82도 이하로 유지하는 게 새 법의 핵심이다. 수시로 실내 근무자의 온열질환 여부를 모니터링해야 하고 물 공급과 냉방 시설을 설치해 운영해야 한다.
만약 82도 유지가 어렵거나 높은 온도에서 일해야 하는 경우라면 업주는 보호 장비를 지급하거나 휴식 시간을 자주 부여하고 근무 교대제를 실시해 고열 노출을 최소화해야 한다.
더욱이 고온에 따른 위해를 피하고 싶다는 근로자에게 업주는 휴식 시간을 허용해야 할 의무가 주어진다.
새 법은 기후변화에 따라 가주 기온이 평균보다 높은 현상이 빈번하게 발생하는 상황에서 고열 실내 근로자의 안전을 제고하기 위해 도입됐다.
가주정부는 새 법의 적용으로 교정 시설과 원격 근무자를 제외한 모든 실내 근로자에게 적용돼 약 140만명의 근로자가 새 법의 혜택을 볼 것으로 기대하고 있다.
당장 새 법이 시행됨에 따라 관련 업종의 한인 업주들에게는 발등에 불이 떨어진 격이 됐다. 별도의 냉방 시설이 없는 봉제 공장이나 창고 등은 새 법에 따라 관련 시설을 설치해야 하기 때문이다. 식당 주방도 마찬가지다. 냉방 시설 설치가 현실적으로 어렵다 보니 열을 피할 수 있는 보호 장비를 지급하기도 쉽지 않고 잦은 휴식 시간이나 교대 근무도 불가능한 형편이다.
새 법을 위반할 경우 해당 직원은 직원안전보건국(OSHA)에 온라인이나 전화로 위반 업주를 고발하면 현장 조사 후 법적 제재에 들어간다.
김해원 노동법 전문 변호사는 "한인들이 많이 종사하는 요식업이나 봉제업, 물류업, 농업, 운송업 등이 새 법 실시로 타격을 볼 것으로 보인다"며 "관련 한인 업주들은 새 법을 준수와 함께 부상 및 질병 예방 프로그램(IIPP)을 갖춰두는 게 필요하다"고 조언했다.

남상욱 기자

캘리포니아 대법원, 우버 차량운전자 ‘독립 계약자’로 판결

 http://www.koreatimes.com/article/20240725/1523489

캘리포니아 대법원, 우버 차량운전자 ‘독립 계약자’로 판결


이번 판결은 수천 명의 운전자를 직원으로 취급할 경우 많은 회사가 캘리포니아주에서 서비스를 중단하거나 제한해야 한다고 주장해온 차량공유서비스 업체들의 승리로 평가된다.

우버는 성명에서 "이번 판결은 운전자에게 기록적인 혜택과 보호를 제공하면서 동시에 독립성도 유지하도록 한 캘리포니아 주민 천만 명의 뜻을 지지한 것"이라고 밝혔다.

SEIU 캘리포니아 지부의 타아 오르는 "노조는 이번 판결에 실망했지만 공유서비스업체 운전자들은 노조를 결성해 권리를 위해 계속 싸울 것"이라면서 "각 근로자는 긱 경제의 공정성을 보장하기 위해 노력하고 있다"고 말했다.

긱 근로자란 우버 차량 운전자처럼 직장에 매이지 않고 단기간에 여러 가지 일을 하는 임시노동자를 말한다.

긱 근로자를 직원으로 대우할 것인지 독립 계약자로 대우할 것인지는 차량 서비스 업계에서 매우 중요한 문제다. 직원인 경우 최저임금, 초과 근무 수당, 비용 보상 등 여러 혜택을 받을 수 있지만 독립 계약자는 이를 받지 못한다. 기업 입장에서는 독립계약자로 인정받는 경우 비용을 30%까지 낮출 수 있다.

우버나 리프트 등 앱 기반 서비스 업체들은 '법안 22' 통과를 위해 2억 달러 이상을 지출했다.

법안 22는 지난 2020년 11월 캘리포니아 유권자의 약 60%가 찬성해 통과됐다.

<연합뉴스>

Uber, Lyft, DoorDash workers remain contractors due to California Supreme Court ruling

 https://calmatters.org/economy/2024/07/prop-22-california-gig-work-law-upheld/

Uber, Lyft, DoorDash workers remain contractors due to California Supreme Court ruling

A protester holds up a red, white and black sign against proposition 22 during a protest.
Ride-share drivers of the California Gig Workers Union at a press conference outside the Supreme Court of California in San Francisco on May 21, 2024. The state Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Prop. 22, a ballot initiative that allows companies, such as Uber and Lyft, to classify drivers as independent contractors. Photo by Juliana Yamada for CalMatters

IN SUMMARY

State’s highest court refuses to overturn voter-backed Prop. 22, a law written by the gig industry. The ruling means gig workers will remain independent contractors.

In a major victory for gig-work companies, the California Supreme Court today upheld a voter-approved law that allows Uber and other app makers to treat their drivers and delivery workers as independent contractors instead of employees.

The decision on Proposition 22 was unanimous. Approved by 58% of California voters in 2020 and enacted the same year, Prop. 22 gave app-based gig workers some benefits but not full worker protections because the ballot initiative — which gig companies spent more than $200 million to pass — ensures they are not considered employees.

More than 1.4 million Californians are app-based gig workers for companies such as Uber, Lyft, DoorDash and Instacart, according to the industry’s latest estimates. 

The court was not considering the pros and cons of the gig economy. During oral arguments in May in San Francisco, justices zeroed in on whether Prop. 22 was incompatible with California law, which gives the Legislature responsibility over a complete workers’ compensation system. By declaring gig workers independent contractors, Prop 22 made them ineligible for workers’ comp benefits. SEIU California, the Service Employees International Union that had sought to overturn the law on behalf of four gig workers, argued that this made the law unconstitutional. 

The law about the Legislature and worker’s comp “does not preclude the electorate from exercising its initiative power to legislate on matters affecting workers’ compensation,” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote in today’s ruling.

Liu also wrote that a section of Prop. 22 “does not itself restrict the Legislature’s authority to enact workers’ compensation legislation.”

Scott Kronland, the attorney who argued the case on behalf of SEIU California, told CalMatters that the ruling “expressly leaves open the possibility of legislation that provides worker’s compensation benefits for app drivers.” 

Still, advocates for gig workers said the ruling was a blow. 

“This is a really tragic outcome,” said Veena Dubal, a law professor at UC Irvine who focuses on labor and inequality. “But it’s not the end of the road.” Dubal speculated that labor advocates could put together a proposition of their own, or municipalities and the state could adopt ordinances and laws that are more worker-friendly — such as making it illegal to set different wages for similar work based on algorithmic formulas.

Gig companies backed Prop. 22 in 2020 to win themselves an exclusion from a new state law known as Assembly Bill 5, which would have upended their business models by requiring them to consider their drivers and delivery workers as employees. Last month, Uber lost a legal battle to overturn AB 5 — meaning only Prop. 22 stood in the way of forcing ride-hailing and delivery app companies to comply with it.

William Gould, professor emeritus at Stanford Law School and a former chairman of the National Labor Relations Board, called the ruling “an enormous setback for workers who are marginalized.” Gould added that “companies showed this is the way to repeal what the Legislature does: using an expensive, well-financed campaign to deny worker rights.”

Under Prop. 22, gig workers are promised guaranteed minimum earnings of 120% of minimum wage, health care stipends, occupational accident insurance and accidental death insurance. Many of the benefits come with stipulations:

  • The guaranteed earnings are based on time on a “gig” and don’t include time workers spend waiting for a ride or delivery.
  • The health care stipends are for certain eligible workers only, excluding those who qualify for public assistance, including Medi-Cal.
  • The occupational accident insurance has a $1 million limit
  • Gig workers are reimbursed for their mileage, although at less than the IRS-mandated rate employees receive — currently 35 cents a mile vs. 67 cents a mile. But this amount is included in the minimum earnings guarantee — it is not in addition to it.
  • Because Prop. 22 will stand, app-based platform workers will continue to be ineligible for benefits such as sick pay, a minimum wage for all time worked, unemployment insurance and more.

Representatives of Uber, DoorDash and Instacart sent statements hailing the decision as a win for gig workers and for California voters.

Molly Weedn, spokesperson for the gig industry group Protect App-Based Drivers + Services, called the ruling “an overwhelming victory for voters’ rights and the integrity of our state’s initiative system.”

A driver in Coachella Valley who participated in the industry group’s press conference today, Stephanie Whitfield, said she has relied on her income from driving to supplement her substitute-teaching income, especially after having major back surgery. 

“I needed something I could work around my doctor’s appointments,” Whitfield said. “App-based driving has been invaluable to me.”

But other gig workers said Prop. 22 has not helped them much. They said their wages have stayed low and their benefits fall short of what they want. 

Sergio Avedian, a ride-hailing driver, podcaster and contributor at the Rideshare Guy, a popular gig-work blog, said the ruling means “the hunger games continue… it means (only) a small percentage of drivers receive (Prop. 22) benefits due to restrictions.”

Another driver, Alejandro Partida, said during a press conference by Los Angeles-based Rideshare Drivers United: “We’ve seen how (Prop 22) it harms workers… who are mostly immigrants and people of color. (We) are entitled to worker protections just like other employees.”

Gig worker advocates vowed not to give up.

“We’ll continue to fight until we have justice for drivers and all workers,” Nicole Moore, president of Los Angeles-based Rideshare Drivers United, told CalMatters. Moore added that this ruling could mean “app companies are coming for all of our jobs, whether it’s in health care, construction, entertainment.”

Moore said during the press conference: “We need the help of legislators, the attorney general, of cities to find a creative pathway to ensure that drivers have adequate pay for our families.”

2024년 7월 25일 목요일

[리포트] “우버 운전사, 직원 아닌 독립계약자” CA 최종 판결

 https://www.radiokorea.com/news/article.php?uid=447813

[리포트] “우버 운전사, 직원 아닌 독립계약자” CA 최종 판결

Photo Credit: unsplash
[앵커멘트]

CA 대법원이 오늘 (25일) 앱 기반 차량 공유업체와 배달업체 운전사를 채용된 직원이 아닌 독립계약자로 구분하도록 최종 판결했습니다.
운전자 노조 측이 제기했던 앱 기반의 서비스, 일명 '긱 이코노미(Gig Economy)' 종사자를 독립계약자로 규정한 주민발의안 22가 위헌이라는 소송을 기각한 것입니다.

김신우 기자가 보도합니다.

[리포트]

지난 2020년, 운전자나 배달부 등을 독립계약자로 분류하기 어렵게한 법안 AB5에서 앱 기반 서비스 종사자들은 제외돼야 한다는 주민발의안 22가 나왔습니다.

앱 기반 차량 공유업체와 배달 업체인 우버, 리프트, 도어데쉬 등 운전자들을 정규직원으로 볼 것인지, 혹은 독립계약자로 대우할 것인지에 대한 법정 공방이 약 4년 만에 드디어 오늘 종료됐습니다.

CA주 법원이 이같은 ‘긱 이코노미’ 종사자들을 근로자가 아닌 독립계약자로 봐야 한다고 최종 판결한 것입니다.

이에 따라 우버와 리프트 등 기업들은 고용한 운전기사들을 일반 회사직원이 아닌, 독립적 지위를 가진 계약자이자 자영업자로 취급할 수 있게 됐습니다.

이렇게 되면 우버나 리프트 운전사들은 최저임금 기준의 적용을 받지 않게되고 오버타임이나 병가 등 회사로부터 베네핏을 제공받지 못하게 됐습니다.  

우버는 최종 판결 이후 성명을 내고 “CA 대법원이 운전자들에게 역사적인 혜택과 보호를 제공하는 동시에 그들의 독립성을 인정한다는 주민발의안 22를 지지함에 따라 CA주민들의 손을 들었다”고 환영했습니다.

이어 “운전자들이 회사 고용 모델을 강요받지 않고 그들이 원하는 시간과 방법으로 자유롭게 일을 계속할 수 있게 됐다”고 강조했습니다.

앞서 주민발의안 22는 그 동안 계속된 논란 속에서 결과도 여러 차례 뒤집혀온 바 있습니다.

2020년 차량공유 플랫폼 업체들은 운전자를 노동자로 분류할 경우, 회사의 보장항목이 늘어나고 사업이 위축될 수 있다고 판단하며 프로포지션 22에 대한 지지를 호소했습니다.

법안 통과 직후에는 운전사 노조는 긱 이코노미 종사자들이 최저 임금, 오버타임,병가 등의 혜택에서 사각지대에 놓이게 될 것이라며 이에 대한 부당성을 주장해온 바 있습니다.  

라디오코리아 뉴스 김신우입니다. 

Cal/OSHA Urges Employers to Protect Workers during Extreme Heat Wave

 https://www.dir.ca.gov/DIRNews/2024/2024-54.html#:~:text=Cal%2FOSHA's%20heat%20illness%20prevention,in%20addition%20to%20regular%20breaks.

Release Number: 2024-54
Date: July 2, 2024

Cal/OSHA Urges Employers to Protect Workers during Extreme Heat Wave

Cal/OSHA is urging all employers to protect workers from heat illness as high temperatures are forecast for the first week of July across California.

Temperatures are expected to exceed 110°F in many parts of the state and are forecast to peak Thursday, July 4 through Saturday, July 6.

When working in hotter conditions, workers must be closely observed for any signs of heat illness.

In indoor workplaces, employers must correct unsafe conditions for workers created by heat as part of their Injury and Illness Prevention Program.

Employers in California must take steps to protect outdoor workers from heat illness by providing water, rest, shade and training.

Cal/OSHA’s heat illness prevention standard applies to all outdoor worksites. To prevent heat illness, the law requires employers to provide outdoor workers fresh water, access to shade at 80 degrees, and, whenever requested by a worker, cool-down rest breaks in addition to regular breaks. Employers must also maintain a written prevention plan with effective training for supervisors to recognize the common signs and symptoms of heat illness, and what to do in case of an emergency.

In certain industries, when the temperature at outdoor worksites reaches or exceeds 95 degrees, Cal/OSHA’s standard requires additional protections. The industries with additional high-heat requirements are agriculture, construction, landscaping, oil and gas extraction, and transportation of agricultural products, construction materials or other heavy materials. High-heat procedures include ensuring employees are observed regularly for signs of heat illness and establishing effective communication methods so workers can contact a supervisor when needed.

Employers with outdoor workers in all industries must take the following steps to prevent heat illness:

Cal/OSHA Urges Employers to Protect Workers Amid Forecast Heat Wave

  • Plan – Develop and implement an effective written heat illness prevention plan that includes emergency response procedures.
  • Training – Train all employees and supervisors on heat illness prevention.
  • Water – Provide drinking water that is fresh, pure, suitably cool, and free of charge so that each worker can drink at least 32 ounces (or four cups of water) per hour and encourage workers to do so.
  • Rest – Encourage workers to take a cool-down rest in the shade for at least five minutes when they feel the need to do so to protect themselves from overheating. Workers should not wait until they feel sick to cool down.
  • Shade – Provide proper shade when temperatures exceed 80 degrees. Workers have the right to request and be provided shade to cool off at any time.

Cal/OSHA’s Heat Illness Prevention special emphasis program includes enforcement of the heat regulation as well as multilingual outreach and training programs for California’s employers and workers. Details on heat illness prevention requirements and training materials are available online on

Cal/OSHA’s Heat Illness Prevention web page and the 99calor.org informational website. A Heat Illness Prevention online tool is also available on Cal/OSHA’s website.

Cal/OSHA helps protect workers from health and safety hazards on the job in almost every workplace in California. Employers who have questions or need assistance with workplace health and safety programs can call Cal/OSHA’s Consultation Services Branch at 800-963-9424.

Workers who have questions about heat illness prevention in indoor and outdoor places of employment can call 833-579-0927 to speak with a bilingual Cal/OSHA representative Monday through Friday from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. Complaints about workplace safety and health hazards can be filed confidentially with Cal/OSHA district offices.

Cal/OSHA has established the Heat Illness Prevention (HIP) Network, a voluntary partnership aimed at increasing awareness among employers and workers about the importance of preventing heat illness in California and the importance of taking steps to prevent work-related illnesses and fatalities. To join the HIP Network, email HIPNetwork@dir.ca.gov.

California’s long-awaited indoor heat standard has gone into effect. Here’s what to know

 https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2024-07-24/californias-long-awaited-indoor-heat-standard-goes-into-effect

California’s long-awaited indoor heat standard has gone into effect. Here’s what to know

Workers in a kitchen.
Workers prepare food in a ghost kitchen for a Main Chick Hot Chicken in Los Angeles. 
(Patrick T. Fallon/Los Angeles Times)

More than a million workers laboring in warehouses, kitchens, laundry rooms and other hot indoor settings across California are now protected by new safety measures that went into effect on Tuesday.

The indoor heat illness prevention rule, adopted by the standards board at the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health last month, regulates indoor workplaces that reach or surpass 82 degrees.

After years of delays, labor leaders celebrated the implementation of the rule. They had pressed in recent weeks for a mandated legal review of the rule to be expedited in order to get the protections in place as early on in the summer as possible.

“[W]e are relieved that the indoor heat protections are now finally in effect in California,” said Lorena Gonzalez, head of the California Labor Federation, in a statement Wednesday. “This long-overdue victory for workers cannot be overstated; these protections from extreme heat will save countless lives.”

Here’s what you should know about the new rule:

What are the new protections?

The new safety measures require employers to provide water, cooling areas and monitoring of workers for signs of heat illness whenever indoor workplace temperatures reach or surpass 82 degrees.

If temperatures climb to 87 degrees, or workers are required to work near hot equipment, employers must cool the work site. If doing so is not feasible, they must allow for more breaks, rotate workers out of hot environments and make other adjustments.

Designated cool-down areas are supposed to be as close as possible to where employees are working, and large enough that workers can sit normally without touching each other. They must be blocked from direct sunlight and shielded from heat sources, with adequate ventilation and cooling.

Drinking water must be available in multiple locations and should be “fresh, pure, suitably cool, and provided to workers free of charge,” the new rule says.

In guidance Cal/OSHA officials issued to employers, supervisors are advised to taste the water and pour it on their skin to check that it is adequate.

Employers should remind and encourage workers to drink water frequently in training sessions as well as throughout the work day, as workers “may not feel how urgently their bodies need water,” according to Cal/OSHA guidance.

Under the new rule, employers are required to allow workers to take cool-down rests if they feel they need to protect themselves from overheating.

“Waiting until symptoms appear before taking a cool-down rest may be too late,” Cal/OSHA guidance says.

More details about the indoor heat standard are available on Cal/OSHA’s website. The safeguards are similar to an existing rule establishing regulations for workers in outdoor settings.

Which workers are covered by the new rule?

The indoor heat standard applies to most workplaces. The state estimates the new rule will apply to about 1.4 million people who work indoors in conditions that can easily become exposed to extreme heat. Industries anticipated to be most affected include warehouses, manufacturing and restaurants.

The indoor heat rule does not apply to correctional staff or inmate workers in prisons, local detention facilities, and juvenile facilities.

The Department of Corrections and Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration are in the process of consulting with worker advocates to create a separate indoor heat rule for these facilities. It is unclear how long it will take to develop and implement those protections.

The newly implemented rule also does not apply to employees who are working remotely from places not under the control of their employer.

What happens if an employer doesn’t follow the heat rule?

Workers who believe their workplaces are not adequately protecting them from extreme heat conditions can file a complaint with Cal/OSHA online or by calling (833) 579-0927.

It’s possible, however, that enforcement will be slow. California agencies responsible for enforcing labor laws have also been beset by inadequate staffing and claims of ineffectiveness.

Cal/OSHA is grappling with a 38% job vacancy rate and faced sharp criticism at a February hearing of the Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment, where farm workers testified that they’d been exposed to extreme heat and pesticides on the job.

“We will continue pushing Cal/OSHA to prioritize enforcement so that bad employers can’t get away with subjecting workers to life-threatening working conditions from indoor heat exposure,” said Gonzalez, the California Labor Federation president, in her Wednesday statement.

Are there similar protections at the federal level?

California in 2006 became the first state in the nation to establish permanent heat protections for outdoor workers and is among just a handful of states that have adopted indoor heat regulations.

There is no similar standard at the federal level, although the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration this month released details of its proposed rule to protect indoor and outdoor workers from high temperatures. The move is a major step forward, though the rule must receive feedback, among other steps, and likely will not be finalized for a while.

Louis Blumberg, a senior climate policy advisor at Climate Resolve, said California’s move to finally adopt the indoor heat standard means that it “automatically becomes a model, or at least a floor for federal agencies to consider and adopt.”

“This is very important as a labor issue. But it’s bigger than that. It’s an important step toward building climate resilience on a society-wide basis,” Blumberg said.

A federal standard would be particularly significant in states such as Florida and Texas — which have passed laws blocking cities or employers from establishing heat rules.